Tuesday, April 28, 2020
Political Control Of The Military Essays - Vietnam War,
  Political Control of the Military        "No new taxes." This is a quote that most all of us remember   from the 1992 presidential election. Along with it we remember that   there were new taxes during that presidents term in office. There are   a myriad of promises made and things done in a presidential election   year that have questionable motives as to whether they are done in the   best interest of the people or in the interests of the presidential   candidate. These hidden interests are one of the biggest problems   with the political aspects of government in modern society. One of   the prime examples of this is the Vietnam War. Although South Vietnam   asked for our help, which we had previously promised, the entire   conflict was managed in order to meet personal political agendas and   to remain politically correct in the world's eyes rather than to bring   a quick and decisive end to the conflict. This can be seen in the   selective bombing of Hanoi throughout the course of the Vietnam War.   Politically this strategy looked very good. However, militarily it   was ludicrous. War is the one arena in which politicians have no   place. War is the military's sole purpose. Therefore, the U. S.   Military should be allowed to conduct any war, conflict, or police   action that it has been committed to without political interference or   control because of the problems and hidden interests which are always   present when dealing with polit      United States involvement in the Vietnam War actually began in   1950 when the U. S. began to subsidize the French Army in South   Vietnam. This involvement continued to escalate throughout the 1950's   and into the early 1960's. On August 4, 1964 the Gulf of Tonkin   incident occurred in which American Naval Vessels in South Vietnamese   waters were fired upon by North Vietnam. On August 5, 1964 President   Johnson requested a resolution expressing the determination of the   United Sates in supporting freedom and in protecting peace in   southeast Asia ( Johnson ). On August 7, 1964, in response to the   presidential request, Congress authorized President Johnson to take   all necessary measures to repel any attack and to prevent aggression   against the U. S. in southeast Asia ( United States ). The selective   bombing of North Vietnam began immediately in response to this   resolution. In March of the following year U. S. troops began to   arrive.      Although the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution specifically stated   that we had no military, political, or territorial ambitions in   southeast Asia, the interests back home were quite a different story   ( Johnson ). The political involvement in Vietnam was about much more   than just promised aid to a weak country in order to prevent the   spread of communism. It was about money. After all, wars require   equipment, guns, tools and machinery. Most of which was produced in   the United States. It was about proving America's commitment to stop   communism. Or rather to confine communism in its present boundaries   But most of all it was about politics. The presidential political   involvement in Vietnam had little to do with Vietnam at all. It was   about China for Eisenhower, about Russia for Kennedy, about Washington   D.C. for Johnson, and about himself for Nixon ( Post ). The last two   of which were the major players in America's involvement in regards to   U. S. Troops being used ( Wittman ).       The military involvement in Vietnam is directly related to the   political management of the military throughout the war. The   military controlled by the politicians. The micro management of the   military by the White House for political gain is the primary reason   for both the length and cost, both monetary and human, of the Vietnam   War ( Pelland ). One of the largest problems was the lack of a clear   objective in the war and the support to accomplish it. The   predominant military opinion of the military's role in Vietnam in   respect to the political involvement is seen in the following quote by   General Colin Powell, "If you're going to put into something then you   owe the armed forces, you owe the American People, you owe just you're   own desire to succeed, a clear statement of what political objective   you're trying to achieve    
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)